AGGRESSION: SIBLING RIVALRY

What is a dominance hierarchy and why is it important to dogs?

Dogs are social animals whose evolutionary history makes them willing and able to live in groups. Group living enabled wolves to work together to obtain food, raise their young and defend their territory. It would be counterproductive for members of a group to fight with each other and risk injury. That would prevent them from working with the group. As a result, dogs have a social structure in which each dog is either dominant (leader) or subordinate in its relationship with each other pack member. This is a "dominance hierarchy". The leader or "alpha" dog is the one that has first access to all the "critical" resources. These resources include food, resting places, mates, territory and favored possessions. Assertion of dominance by the alpha is generally communicated through facial expressions, body postures and actions. Fighting is rare, since as soon as the subordinate submits or defers to the alpha animal and the alpha gets its way, he or she gives up the challenge.

My dogs have lived together for some time and now they are fighting. Why?

Fights between dogs in the household are often about social status. Social status aggression most often occurs when dogs reach social maturity between 12 and 36 months of age. Fights will be about those resources that are considered important to dogs. Therefore fights may occur over treats, owner attention, priority to greet the owner upon return, sleeping positions, entrances and exits around the home, or movement through tight spaces and during highly arousing situations such as front window disturbances. These fights occur most often between dogs of near equal status and often, but not always, dogs of the same sex. Disputes between female dogs tend to be very severe.

I try to treat my dogs equally, but they still fight. What am I doing wrong?

Trying to treat two dogs as equals will only serve to counter the natural tendency toward a hierarchy. The dog that is the more dominant in a relationship needs to be supported in its position and the more subordinate must be taught to accept the relationship. When you support or encourage the subordinate dog as it tries to gain access to resources such as your attention, the dominant dog may begin to challenge and fight, in an effort to keep the lower ranking dog in its "place". If you then discipline the dominant dog, or pull the dominant dog away, you have favored, supported and come to the aid of the subordinate dog. This will prolong the dispute.

Why did my dogs begin to fight after my other dog died?

Conflicts may occur between dogs when the dominance status is ambiguous or when they are particularly close in rank. After the decline, illness or death of an older dog, fighting may begin in the remaining dogs even when one is clearly dominant. This is because the older dog may have been dominant to both dogs, and now they are trying to establish new positions. In any case the fighting can be severe and injurious. Although you should generally attempt to allow dogs to resolve their differences on their own you will need to intervene if there is the potential for injury. However, you could be injured due to redirected aggressive attacks, or when you attempt to break up the fight (see below), so extreme care is necessary.

My younger dog always deferred to the older dog, but now they fight.

One scenario that can result in social aggression is when an older, previously dominant dog, is challenged by a younger, more domineering dog. This may happen as the older dog ages, or as the younger dog reaches behavioral maturity at 12 to 36 months. This is often clearly an attempt to alter the existing hierarchy. Sometimes the older dog will acquiesce and things are fine but at other times the owners do not want the change and intervene. In some situations, the older dog will not relinquish the dominant role even though it cannot physically compete with the younger dog. This can result in severe, injurious fights.

How should I break up fighting if it occurs?

This can be a dangerous situation for people and dogs alike. Owners usually try to reach for the collar of the fighting dogs, or if one is small, pick it up. This can result in severe owner injury if the fighting is very intense. If both are wearing leads they can usually be pulled apart. If all else fails, you might be able to break up the fight with a broom, sound alarm or another distraction (such as a fire extinguisher). If using an extinguisher, then care must be taken to avoid damaging the eyes with either a powerful spray or the cold gas. Reaching for the dog is usually the worst thing to do, as you could be injured. It is often useful to have a length of stick to defend yourself, should a dog turn on you. This is used to direct the dogs bite to a harmless area i.e. the stick, NOT to hit the dog.

When people intervene in dog fights, redirected aggression is possible. Aggression (growl, snarl or bite) can be redirected to a person, animal or object other than that which evoked the aggression. If during the course of a dog fight, you pick up one of the dogs, the other may continue to attack and direct it at you.

What should I do when one of my dogs challenges another?

A common owner error is the desire to make life "fair". This often results in owners allowing subordinate dogs access to resources, such as attention, treats, toys, or entry into territory that they would not normally have. Usually the subordinate dog would not behave in a manner that would challenge the dominant when no one is around to "protect" it. If you encourage or protect the subordinate dog, it may exploit the situation, and the dominant dog may become aggressive in order to assert its control. If you then punish the dominant dog for aggression, the subordinate dog learns it can engage in prohibited behavior while the owner is present. This is why, in many households, there is no fighting when the owners are gone. The subordinate is aware of the situational basis to the hierarchy, and does nothing to challenge the dominant dog, unless the owners are around to support them.

How can I treat this problem?

Although the dominance relationship between the two dogs must be dealt with, the first step is for the owner to gain complete control over both dogs. Your presence and commands should be sufficient to prevent and control all dominance challenges between dogs. Control of each dog is achieved through the use of verbal commands, by leaving a lead and head collar attached for immediate control, and by controlling access to all rewards including food treats, toys and games. This should be given at your instigation not that of the dogs and toys should not be left down the whole time. Attention on demand not only encourages situations where one dog may challenge the other, but also allows your dogs to control you. Inattention on demand teaches the dogs that all rewards are provided only when you choose, and reduces or eliminates those situations where challenges might occur. Head collar with lead control and obedience-reward based training of each dog should first be done separately. With a head collar and remote lead on each dog you will have effective control, and a means of controlling and separating the dogs if needed. With control of the head and mouth, aggressive threats can be curtailed and either dog can be placed in a subordinate posture, by pulling up on the lead, closing the mouth or pulling the head sideways so that the dog's gaze is averted.

Treatment should be designed to identify and support the dominant dog. In most cases this is the younger, larger, more physically capable dog. Often, this is also reported to be the aggressor. You must allow the dominant dog priority in all instances of potential competition. This might include the opportunity to go outside, to come in, or to receive food or owner attention and affection. If you are petting the dominant dog and the subordinate dog approaches, make it wait. Avoid all circumstances that elicit aggression. If the more dominant dog approaches or challenges the subordinate dog and the subordinate dog assumes a subordinate posture, the owners are not to intervene as long as the dominant dogs stop. If the dogs are likely to fight when you are away or at homecomings, separate the dogs whenever you are out, or are not able to supervise.

On other occasions, neither dog is willing to be subordinate. This could be due to a challenge to the hierarchy as a younger dog matures, as an older dog becomes sick or aged, when a new dog is introduced into the home, or when one dog is not clearly dominant to the other. It is important to recognize canine body language and low level threats such as eye contact, snarls or low growls. Keep records of threats, attacks, or tension producing situations. An owner must have excellent control over both dogs in order to succeed. To facilitate treatment, decrease the chances of injuries and increase owner control, a remote lead can be left attached to one or both dogs. Often the best form of owner control is to fit and train each dog with a head halter, and to leave a lead and head halter on each dog when they are together (under the owner's supervision).

Once you have gained sufficient control over both dogs, and have identified the more dominant, you will need to deal with the circumstances that might elicit aggression. Greetings should be calm rather than overly exciting, and both dogs may need to be ignored. Treats are avoided and rawhides or other delicious things are not given unless the dogs are separated or on lead. Movement through tight spaces is avoided or controlled. You must be present to ensure that the dominant dog gains preferential access to food, resting places, territory, owner attention and treats. Commands and rewards or the lead and halter can be used to ensure that the subordinate does not challenge, and that the dominant does not continue to show aggression once the subordinate submits. Getting the dogs together without incident can be accomplished most easily when the dogs are distracted and when a confrontation is unlikely, such as during walks or feeding. It is usually best to have two individuals to walk the dogs (each person controls one dog) and not to allow them to forge in front of one another. During feeding, keep the dogs at a distance, far enough apart that they do not show aggression. Slowly the dishes are moved closer together as long as the dogs do not react. The food serves as a reward in this situation. If the dogs react, the food bowls are moved further apart. When the owner is not home or supervising the dogs, the dogs are separated or caged.

Well-fitting and secure basket muzzles could be left on each dog to increase safety while the dogs are together. They can also be used to "proof" the training, by putting the dogs together in situations that previously led to aggression. Drug therapy for one or both dogs may also be useful.

Can social aggression always be corrected?

At times aggression may persist despite owner control and intervention. In those cases alternative living arrangements for one of the animals may need to be made.

Back to Canine Information Index